Comments on: Making generic XML work http://blog.dolphinling.net/2005/05/making-generic-xml-work/ ...whatever goes through my head... Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:50:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: dolphinling’s weblog » Blog Archive » (Markup) changes I would make http://blog.dolphinling.net/2005/05/making-generic-xml-work/comment-page-1/#comment-684 dolphinling’s weblog » Blog Archive » (Markup) changes I would make Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:04:26 +0000 /?p=89#comment-684 [...] New namespaces would be easy to generate, and it would be easy to make machines (partially) understand them, without needing those machines to be updated at all. See my post on this topic. [...] [...] New namespaces would be easy to generate, and it would be easy to make machines (partially) understand them, without needing those machines to be updated at all. See my post on this topic. [...]

]]> By: Mark Wubben http://blog.dolphinling.net/2005/05/making-generic-xml-work/comment-page-1/#comment-56 Mark Wubben Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:10:37 +0000 /?p=89#comment-56 <p>Heh, I wrote something similar on Anne's place:</p> <p>http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2005/05/generic-xml#comment-4218 </p> Heh, I wrote something similar on Anne’s place:

http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2005/05/generic-xml#comment-4218

]]> By: Jimmy Cerra http://blog.dolphinling.net/2005/05/making-generic-xml-work/comment-page-1/#comment-52 Jimmy Cerra Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:43:23 +0000 /?p=89#comment-52 <p><abbr>XSLT</abbr> to your arbitrary language of choice. :-) If you restrict yourself to <abbr>RDF</abbr>, then <abbr title="web ontology language">OWL</abbr> is easier.</p> XSLT to your arbitrary language of choice. :-) If you restrict yourself to RDF, then OWL is easier.

]]>